Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The issues related to the history of the establishment of the institution of copyright protection, with the division of powers of collective management organizations, with the functions of organizations and their types, with the difference between collective management of copyright and such a concept as representation are touched upon. Attention is paid to some urgent problems related to the improvement of this institution, international standards for copyright protection and comparative legal analysis of national legislation, as well as the opinions of scientists from Uzbekistan and other different countries. Suggestions and recommendations were put forward of scientific and practical importance for national copyright law.
References
1.International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers (CISAC), As Long as There Are Authors (International Confederation of Societies of Authors and Composers, 1996), 64.
2.The biography of Firmin Ge´mier may be found online: URL: www.answers.com/topic/firming-mier
3.URL: www.cisac.org
4.The French law on authors’ rights (the civil law version of copyright) is actually known as the Code of Literary and Artistic Property, Law No. 92–597 of 1 Jul. 1992, as amended by Laws No. 94–361 of 10 May 1994, and 95–4 of 3 Jan. 1995.
5.M. Ficsor, Collective Management of Copyright and Related Rights World Intellectual Property Organization, 2002 // URL: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_855.pdf
6.О.Окюлов. Правовой статус интеллектуальной собственности. Автореф.дис.док.юр.наук. Т.:ТГЮИ. 2000 г.
7.Тошев Б. Законодательные основы и формы защиты авторских прав в Республики Узбекистан. Автореф.дис.канд.юр.наук. – Т.:1999.
8.Закон Республики Узбекистан «Об авторских и смежных правах». №ЗРУ-42 20.07.2006 // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/1023494