PROCEDURES AND PRACTICES OF LEADING ARBITRATION INSTITUTIONS (TIAC, ICC, LCIA, SIAC, ICAC AT THE RF CCI): THE UNIQUENESS OF THEIR APPROACHES TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Abstract

This article presents a comparative legal analysis of the procedures and practices of leading international and regional arbitration institutions: the International Court of Arbitration of the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC), the London Court of International Arbitration (LCIA), the Singapore International Arbitration Centre (SIAC), the International Commercial Arbitration Court at the Chamber of Commerce and Industry of the Russian Federation, and the Tashkent International Arbitration Centre (TIAC).

The relevance of this study is due to increased competition among arbitration centers and the growing importance of institutional procedures in the parties' selection of an arbitration forum. The aim of the article is to identify the institutional and procedural features of these centers and to determine their significance for resolving cross-border commercial disputes. The methodological foundation comprises formal legal, comparative legal, and analytical methods, as well as analysis of arbitration rules and enforcement practices. The study finds that while maintaining the universal principles of international arbitration, the institutions under consideration have developed different models of dispute administration. These models vary in the degree of institutional oversight, level of digitalization, mechanisms for expedited proceedings, and approaches to ensuring arbitrator independence.