Vol. 1 No. 6 (2020), ARTICLES
Vol. 1 No. 6 (2020)

ISSUES OF LAUNCHING EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL SUPERVISION OVER THE ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION

ARTICLES
Published 2021-01-23
Sindor HAMROQULOV
Department for the coordination of legal education and forensic activities Ministry of Justice// E-mail: s.hamroqulov@mail.ru
PDF (O'zbek)

Keywords

administrative discretion, discretion, discretionary powers, the principle of legitimation of discretion, administrative-procedures, judicial supervision, exclusive discretion, administrative document.

How to Cite

HAMROQULOV, S. (2021). ISSUES OF LAUNCHING EFFECTIVE JUDICIAL SUPERVISION OVER THE ADMINISTRATIVE DISCRETION. LAWYER HERALD, 1(6), 32–36. Retrieved from https://www.yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/131
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

This article is concerned with the issues of launching efficient judicial supervision over the administrative discretion. To this end, it analyses the role of administrative courts, including issues of legitimate applying the judicial power of discretion. For that purpose, the power of administrative discretion has been analysed in a comparative level. It concludes with suggesting recommendations on current regulative framework of legislation.

PDF (O'zbek)

References

Иқтибослар /Сноски /References:

1.Bertrams R. Bank guarantees in International Trade. The Law and Praktice of Indepedent (First Demand) Gearantees and Standby Letters of Credit in Civil Law and Common Law Jurisdictions. Kluwer Law International, 1996. // URL: https://www.amazon.com/Guarantees-International-Trade-Third-Revised/dp/9041122435.

2.Кириллова Александра Дмитриевна Дискреционные полномочия в правоприменительной деятельности органов государственной власти // Известия ТулГУ. Экономические и юридические науки. 2017. №2-2. // URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/diskretsionnye-polnomochiya-v-pravoprimenitelnoy-deyatelnosti-organov-gosudarstvennoy-vlasti (дата обращения: 26.12.2020).

3.Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Маъмурий тартиб-таомиллар тўғрисида”ги Қонуни // (Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 09.01.2018 й., 03/18/457/0525-сон; 07.01.2020 й., 03/20/600/0023-сон) // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/3492199.

4.Татарова А.Д. Понятие и признаки дискреционных полномочий судей. Трибуна молодого ученого, № 3, 2014. // URL: https://journals.kantiana.ru/upload/iblock/db3/Tatarova%20A._110-114.pdf.

5.Ўзбекистон Республикасининг “Маъмурий суд ишларини юритиш тўғрисида”ги кодекси // Қонун ҳужжатлари маълумотлари миллий базаси, 26.01.2018 й., 02/18/ МПК/0627-сон, 12.10.2018 й. // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/3527353.

6.Kopp F., Ramsauer U. Kommentar zum Verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz [Commentary on the law on administrative procedures]. // URL: https://www.beck-shop.de/kopp-ramsauer-verwaltungsverfahrensgesetz-vwvfg/product/30262052.

7.Пуделька Йорг Понятие усмотрения в административном праве Германии и его отграничение от судебного усмотрения // Вестник СПбГУ. Серия 14. Право. 2017. №4. // URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ponyatie-usmotreniya-v-administrativnom-prave-germanii-i-ego-otgranichenie-ot-sudebnogo-usmotreniya (дата обращения: 26.12.2020).