Pdf (O'zbek)
DOI (O'zbek)

Keywords

amaliy bezak san’ati, mualliflik huquqi, raqamli muhit, raqamli “watermark”, blockchain, AI-monitoring, “fair use”, mulkiy huquq, shaxsiy nomulkiy huquq, xalq ijodiyoti.

How to Cite

Kuchkorov , A. (2026). ISSUES OF PROTECTION OF WORKS OF APPLIED DECORATIVE ARTS IN THE DIGITAL ENVIRONMENT. LAWYER HERALD, 1(4), 158–169. Retrieved from https://www.yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1270

Abstract

The development of digital technologies has created new opportunities for the preservation, popularization, and commercialization of applied decorative art works, while also sharply increasing the risks of their unauthorized copying, modification, and reproduction. Ceramics, jewelry, carpets, embroidery, wood carving, textiles and other craft objects, as well as three-dimensional models, can be distributed through the Internet at almost no cost. The article comprehensively examines the legal, technical, contractual, and institutional mechanisms for protecting applied decorative art objects in the digital environment. The article employed formal-legal, comparative-legal, systemic, and functional analysis methods. The relevance of protecting works of applied art in the digital environment, the specifics of protecting copyright objects in the digital environment, the author’s personal non-property and property rights, and a number of complexities and difficulties in their protection are analyzed. The article argues that copyright or a technical tool alone does not provide sufficient protection. Also, blockchain, a number of proposals are put forward, such as the development of technologies such as AI monitoring, DRM, digital watermark and filtering as a means of copyright protection and the introduction of rapid platform protection mechanisms.

Pdf (O'zbek)
DOI (O'zbek)

References

Copyright Licensing in the Digital Environment // https://www.wipo.int/en/web/copyright/activities/copyright_licensing.

Энтин В.Л. Авторское право в виртуальной реальности (новые возможности и вызовы цифровой эпохи). М.: Статут, 2017. 9-c. // URL: https://library.cbr.ru/pdf-viewer/?uid=c394754c-f589-47ae-8e48-63c50cf9b877

Samuelson, P. Copyright’s Fair Use Doctrine and Digital Data. Publishing Research Quarterly, 1995, Vol. 11, pp. 27–39. // URL: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF02680415

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Mualliflik huquqi va turdosh huquqlar toʻgʻrisida”gi 20.07.2006-yildagi O‘RQ–42-son Qonuni // https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-1022944

Heidi Härkönen, “A Narrative Approach to the Standard of Originality in EU Copyright Law: The Story of a Dress”, IIC, 2025, Vol. 56, pp. 289–319. // URL:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/388664300_A_Narrative_Approach_to_the_Standard_of_Originality_in_EU_Copyright_Law_The_Story_of_a_Dress

Qo‘chqorov A. “Intellektual mulk obyekti sifatida amaliy san’at asarlari.” Yurist axborotnomasi, 2026, 1-jild, 1-son, 92-98-betlar. // URL: https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1187

Hua, J. J. Copyright Protection of Works of Applied Art: Rethinking Conceptual Separability and Aesthetic Requirement for Copyrightability. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2017. // https://dl1.icdst.org/pdfs/files3/f59b2690461d9f38456ce52bf1316c44.pdf.

Rosati, E. Copyright at the CJEU: Back to the Start (of Copyright Protection). Oxford University Press, 2023, pp. 211–228.

Adabiy va badiiy asarlarni muhofaza qilish toʻgʻrisida Berna konvensiyasi (Bern, 1886 yil 9 sentabr) // https://lex.uz/docs/-1310607.

Jane C. Ginsburg, The Most Moral of Rights: The Right to Be Recognized as the Author of One’s Work, George Mason Journal of International Commercial Law, 2016. // URL: https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/1988/

Cyrill P. Rigamonti, The Conceptual Transformation of Moral Rights, American Journal of Comparative Law, 2007. // URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294345243_The_conceptual_transformation_of_moral_rights

William W. Fisher III, Theories of Intellectual Property, Cambridge University Press, 2001. // URL: https://dash.harvard.edu/entities/publication/73120379-033d-6bd4-e053-0100007fdf3b

Mayfield, Kendra. “Cheating’s Never Been Easier.” WIRED,

September 2001. // URL: https://www.wired.com/2001/09/cheatings-never-been-easier/

Rudolf Leška, Presumption of Authorship under the Berne Convention and its Application in the Online Environment. // https://www.researchgate.net/publication/351361810_Presumption_of_Authorship_under_the_Berne_Convention_and_its_Application_in_the_Online_Environment.

Lee, Moon Hee, “Seeing’s Insight: Toward a Visual Substantial Similarity Test for Copyright Infringement of Pictorial, Graphic, and Sculptural Works”, April 1, 2017. // https://northwesternlawreview.org/issues/seeings-insight-toward-a-visual-substantial-similarity-test-for-copyright-infringement-of-pictorial-graphic-and-sculptural-works/.