Pdf (O'zbek)

Keywords

criminal subject, natural person, legal entity, minor, age of criminal responsibility, intentional destruction of property, age criterion, sanity, insanity, criminal law, criminal legislation, age determination, age limit

How to Cite

FAYZULLAYEV, A. (2026). SOME REFLECTIONS ON THE SUBJECT OF THE CRIME OF INTENTIONAL DESTRUCTION OR DAMAGE OF PROPERTY. LAWYER HERALD, 1(2), 124–132. Retrieved from https://www.yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1207

Abstract

This article provides a theoretical and practical analysis of the essential characteristics of the subject of the crime of intentional destruction or damage of property. In particular, the concept of the criminal subject is examined with a scientific approach, highlighting key attributes such as the age of criminal responsibility and the criterion of sanity. Within the framework of Article 173 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan, the age characteristics of persons committing this crime and the criteria for their criminal liability are studied. Statistical data show that the share of such crimes committed by minors is relatively low. The author demonstrates the interrelated nature of medical-biological, socio-psychological, and legal criteria in determining the age of criminal responsibility, and thoroughly analyzes the role and significance of these factors in shaping the concept of the criminal subject. The article also examines the general and special age limits of criminal responsibility established by the norms of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Uzbekistan for certain types of crimes, as well as the procedures for determining the age of minors and related procedural features. Research results indicate that minors account for a relatively small proportion of these offenses, particularly in the 14–16 age group. Accordingly, there is no need to lower the age of criminal responsibility, and the current approach is justified both scientifically and practically. The article also offers the author’s perspectives on certain theoretical issues related to the criminal subject.

Pdf (O'zbek)

References

Волкова И.А. Ответственность за фальсификацию доказательств по уголовному делу: Дисс. канд. юрид. наук. – М., 2005. – С. 72.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasining Jinoyat kodeksi. (2026-yil 20-yanvargacha bo‘lgan o‘zgartish va qo‘shimchalar bilan). Yuridik adabiyotlar publish. –Toshkent. 2026-yil. 304-bet. // URL: https://lex.uz/docs/-111453#-179930

Махмудов О. (2026). Субъект в уголовном праве: вопросы уголовной ответственности физических и юридических лиц . Общество и инновации, 7(1), 205–211. URL: https://doi.org/10.47689/2181-1415-vol7-iss1-pp205-211

Rustambayev M.X. O‘zbekiston Respublikasi jinoyat huquqi kursi. Tom 1. Jinoyat haqida ta’limot. Darslik. 2-nashr, to‘ldirilgan va qayta ishlangan – T.: O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Milliy gvardiyasi Harbiy-texnik instituti, 2018. -234

Altiyev R.S. Firibgarlikning jinot-huquqiy va kriminologik jihatlari. Monografiya // Mas’ul muharrir: yu.f.d., professor G.Z.Tulaganova. – 66 b.

Фёдоров А. В. Уголовная ответственность юридических лиц впостсоветских государствах: монография. М., 2022

Utemuratova S. Ekologiya sohasidagi jinoyatlar subyekti sifatida – yuridik shaxslar // Yurist axborotnomasi – Вестник юриста – Lawyer herald. No 3 (2024) B. 71-77. URL: https://yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/985

Кушбаков Д.М. Юридик шахслар жиноий жавобгарлигининг хусусиятлари //Academic research in educational sciencesvolume 2 | issue 5 | 2021. -С.1029-1037. URL: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/yuridik-shahslar-zhinoiy-zhavobgarligining-hususiyatlari

Jinoyat huquqi. (Umumiy qism) Darslik. Mas’ul muharrir: yu.f.f.d (PhD) X.Ochilov – T.: Adolat nashriyoti, 2020. 82 b.

Mamajanov A.M. Aqli rasolikni istisno etmaydigan tarzda ruhiy holati buzilgan shaxslarning jinoiy javobgarligi. Yuridik fanlar boʻyicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent-2024. 19-b.

O‘zbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudining 2025-yil 13-martdagi 07-14/25-7833-sonli javob xati.

Jinoyat ishlari bo‘yicha Urgut tuman sudining 2024-yil 18-martdagi ajrimi // URL: https://public.sud.uz/report/CRIMINAL

O‘zbekiston SSRning Jinoyat kodeksi. Nashr uchun mas’ullar: M.Vosiqova, T.Nigmonov. – Toshkent: O‘zbekiston, 1977. – B. 11.

Abdurasulova Q.R. Jinoyatning maxsus subyekti: O‘quv-qo‘llanma. – Toshkent: TDYUI, 2005. – B. 16.

Adurasulova K.R. Voyaga yetmagan shaxsni jinoyatning subyekti deb topishning zaruriy belgisi // Yurist axborotnomasi – Вестник юриста – Lawyer herald. № 1 (2026) B.99-110. URL: https://www.yuristjournal.uz/index.php/lawyer-herald/article/view/1188

Петрова О.Н. Назначение уголовного наказания несовершеннолетним (уголовно-правовые и криминологические аспекты): Автореф. дисс. …канд. юрид. наук. – Волгоград, 2004. – С. 21.

Ситковская О.Д. Психология уголовной ответственности. – М., 1998. – С. 109.

Usmonaliyev M. Jinoyat huquqi. Umumiy qism. Oliy o‘quv yurtlari uchun darslik. T., «Yangi asr avlodi», 2010, bet.

Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Oliy sudi Plenumining 2000-yil 15-sentabrdagi 21-sonli “Voyaga yetmaganlarning jinoyatlari haqidagi ishlar boʻyicha sud amaliyoti toʻgʻrisida”gi qarori // URL: https://lex.uz/ru/docs/-1449720

Kushbakov D.M. Jinoyat subyektining jinoyat-huquqiy tavsifi va xususiyatlari. Yuridik fanlar bo‘yicha falsafa doktori (PhD) dissertatsiyasi avtoreferati. Toshkent – 2021. 13 b. URL: https://api.ziyonet.uz/uploads/books/7007/61850045ae5a2.pdf

Павлов В.Г. Субъект преступления. – СПб., 2001. – С. 89.

Плютина Е.М. Уничтожение или повреждение имущества: проблемы квалификации и соотношение со смежными составами преступлений (по материалам судебной практики Краснодарского края): дис. … канд. юрид. наук / Е.М. Плютина. – Краснодар, 2006. – С. 99.

Мирончик, А.С. Преступные уничтожение или повреждение чужого имущества: Обоснованность криминализации, оптимизация законодательного описания, квалификация: дис.канд. юрид. наук / А.С. Мирончик. – Красноярск, 2009. – С. 93–94.