Kalit so‘zlar
Abstrakt
Ushbu maqola davlat sektorining ichki va tashqi kontekstini o‘rganadi. Shu bilan birga, tadqiqot davlat sektorining korrupsiya xavfi davlat apparati funktsiyalarini bajaradigan ayrim bo'linmalarning xavflari ekanligini isbotlaydi. OECD va ISO xalqaro standartlari, shuningdek, FATF, Interpol va boshqa xalqaro tashkilotlarning tavsiyalari doimo davlat davlat organining tashqi va ichki kontekstiga e'tibor qaratadi, bu esa ichki va tashqi korrupsiya xavfi har doim korrupsiyaning oldini olish yo'llarini aniqlash imkonini beradi. Davlat sektori kontekstini tahlil qilish korruptsion amaliyotlar uchun eng zaif nuqtalarni ko'rib chiqish imkonini beradi. Davlat organining miqyosi u qamrab olgan muassasalar soni bilan belgilanadi, ya'ni bir funktsiyaning bir nechta jarayonlarini bajarish uchun davlat organiga bir nechta institutlar va shunga mos ravishda kadrlar kerak bo'ladi. Xususan, davlat sektorida korrupsiya uchun shart-sharoit mavjudligini aniqlash imkonini beruvchi 14 ta tashqi belgi, shuningdek, turli korrupsiya sxemalarini amalga oshirishga hissa qo‘shayotgan davlat organlarining zaif tomonlarini ko‘rsatuvchi 6 ta ichki jihatni tahlil qilib, rasmiy vakolatlardan foydalanish).
Библиографические ссылки
1. Белов В.В. Распространение коррупции в системе органов государственной власти России: этапы и проблемы борьбы в 1992-2000 гг. Автореф. дис. канд. юрид. наук. Москва, 2008. - С. 17.
2. Кулишев П.Ю. Организация противодействия коррупции в органах государственной власти: зарубежный опыт. Автореф. дис. . канд. юрид. наук. Москва, 2006. – С. 123.
3. Bjornskov Christian, and Martin Paldam (2004). Corruption Trends. The New Institutional Economics of Corruption. London: Routledge. 2004, p. 59-75.
4. Corrado Germana, and Fiammetta Rossetti (2018). Public Corruption: A Study across Regions in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 40, issue 6, pp. 1130.
5. Corrado Germana and Fiammetta Rossetti (2018). Public Corruption: A Study across Regions in Italy. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 40, issue 6, pp. 1132.
6. De Simone, Francesco, and Shruti Shah (2012). Civil society procurement monitoring: challenges and opportunities. In: Eduardo Bohorquez and Deniz Devrim, eds. A New Role for Citizens in Public Procurement, New Mexico: Transparencia Mexicana.p.25.
7. Dong, Bin, and Benno Torgler (2011). Democracy, Property Rights, Income Equality, and Corruption. FEEM Working Paper No. 8.2011. p. 18.
8. Ferguson, Gerry (2017). Global Corruption: Law, Theory and Practice. Third Edition, University of Victoria.p.54;
9. Ferguson, Gerry (2018). Corruption and Public Procurement. In: G. Ferguson. Global Corruption: Law, Theory and Practice. Chapter Eleven, pp. 942;
10. Finney H. C., & Lesieur H. R. 1982. A contingency of theory of organizational crime. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1: 255–299.
11. Gerring John, and Strom C. Thacker (2005). Do Neoliberal Policies Deter Political Corruption? International Organization, vol. 59, issue 1, pp.233-254.
12. Goel Rajeev K., and Michael A. Nelson (2010). Causes of Corruption: History, Geography and Government. Journal of Policy Modeling, vol. 32, issue 4, pp. 433-447
13. La Porta, Rafael, and others (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 222-279.;
14. Lederman, Daniel, Norman Loayza, and Rodrigo Reis Soares (2005). Accountability and Corruption: Political Institutions Matter. Policy Research Working Papers. Washington, DC: World Bank.
15. Locatelli, Giorgio, and others (2017). Corruption in public projects and megaprojects: There is an elephant in the room! International Journal of Project Management, vol. 45, issue 03, pp. 252-268.
16. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2003). Managing Conflict of Interest in the Public Service: OECD Guidelines and Country Experiences. Paris. (http://www.oecd.org/governance/ethics/conflict-of-interest)
17. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2007a). Bribery in Public Procurement: Methods, Actors and Counter Measures. Paris, p. 102.
18. Paldam, Martin, and Gert Tinggaard Svendsen (2002). Missing social capital and the transition in Eastern Europe, Journal of Institutional Innovation, Development and Transition, vol. 5, pp. 21-34.
19. Pinto, J., Leana, C.R., & Pil, F.K. (2008): "Corrupt Organizations or Organizations of Corrupt Individuals? Two Types of Organization-Level Corruption." Academy of Management Review, 33 (3), 685–709.
20. Rose-Ackerman, Susan, and Bonnie J. Palifka (2016). Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences and Reform. Cambridge University Press. P.10.
21. Tanzi, Vito (1998). Corruption and the budget: Problems and solutions. In: Arvind K. Jain, ed. Economics of Corruption, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
22. Treisman, Daniel (2000). The causes of corruption: a cross national study. Journal of Public Economics, vol. 76, issue 3 (June), pp. 399-457.